Neurologic Physical Therapy in Recovery from Brain Injury
Jared Stehr MSPT | Spring 2023

Stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury are common diagnoses treated by neurologic physical therapists (PTs). The course of treatment varies widely based on the severity of the injury and the potential for recovery. For example, a mild stroke, called a Transient Ischemic Attack, may require no therapies. On the other hand, a severe Traumatic Brain Injury or incomplete spinal cord injury may benefit from PT treatment for years if functional gains continue.


By and large, PT approaches to brain injury have one significant commonality: using sensation and feedback to elicit a response. The goal is to provide the brain with a stimulus (input) and train the brain to respond with a consciously controlled meaningful output or appropriate motion. This process has come to be referred to as part of neuroplasticity. Neuroplasticity is the “capacity of neurons and neural networks in the brain to change their connections and behavior in response to new information, sensory stimulation, development, damage, or dysfunction.”

Quite often, the causes of a particular TBI also cause damage to the musculoskeletal system. Most of these orthopedic injuries, whether fractured bones or damaged joints, will heal in a much shorter time than the recovery of the brain itself. Therefore, the healed body may be waiting for months and years to receive instructions from the brain. As the neuroplastic recovery occurs in the central nervous system, time may elapse. The musculoskeletal system will rapidly deteriorate if the Written by Jared Stehr MSPT brain cannot instruct the body to move and interact with the physical forces and stresses of the world that ordinarily keep it well-conditioned. While waiting for the brain to recover, it is imperative to keep the body “ready to go.” This is reminiscent of the classic axiom, “Use it or lose it.” Preventing joint contractures, minimizing the loss of muscle mass, and weighting the skeletal system to stimulate bone density are essential components of treatment.

Specific neurologic therapy will begin in tandem with orthopedic interventions, increasing in duration and intensity as the patient is able to tolerate new challenges. All physical therapy aims to maximize the patient’s purposefully controlled motion. For example, a relearned movement could be turning the head left to right, pointing a finger, taking one step, balancing on one foot, performing a jumping jack, or throwing a ball. As simple motions are mastered, more complex motions are layered with others to complete tasks eventually. These purposefully controlled motions are combined again and again, creating complex movements that are performed to function and interact with the world.


Immediately following a neurologic injury, PT treatment time is primarily spent on balance, gait, and transfer training. These are paramount in a patient’s ability to return home and regain the initial levels of independence. As recovery progresses, the focus changes to more advanced activities of daily living, function, and potentially return to occupation.

A new trend in neuro-PT treatment is high-intensity training, specifically High-Intensity Gait Training (HIGT). By having a patient ambulate vigorously and continuously, many bodily systems are stimulated simultaneously, creating a cascade of physiologic responses that appear more efficient at eliciting recovery than most traditional PT treatments. While conventional neuro-PT treatments focus substantially on the quality of motion, HIGT deemphasizes the quality of motion if it is safe. Research supporting this approach has caused professional PT organizations to revise their Clinical Practice Guidelines, prioritizing using HIGT as a primary treatment for many neurologically involved populations (www.neuropt.org).


In the proper environment, with the appropriate equipment, HIGT is a treatment option even for severely impacted neurologic patients. Adultsized gait trainers can support the full body weight of a patient if required while keeping them safely within a rolling frame. Both legs may be used to ambulate inside this device, and full weight bearing is encouraged. Ceiling-mounted track systems allow patients to don a full trunk harness and safely walk a circuit while tethered to the installed ceiling track. And finally, if the patient is medically cleared for aquatic therapy, walking in a pool arguably allows the greatest customization of HIGT treatment. The water depth can be chosen to minimize or maximize buoyancy/ impact forces. The viscosity of the water resistively slows motion, lowers fall risk, and provides constant background strengthening. The water’s temperature and enveloping sensation often normalize muscle tone and decrease spasticity. At the moment, the prime limitation of aquatic neuro-PT treatment is access. The availability of suitable therapy pool facilities is low, and the time commitment plus preparation to participate by the patient is high.


Of course, physical therapists do not treat patients in isolation. They are part of a team of allied health professionals, including occupational therapists, speech therapists, recreation therapists, and assistive technologists. Each discipline evaluates patients, determines appropriate goals, and creates a treatment plan. Ideally, each discipline will integrate nonspecialized treatments from the care plans of the other providers as the patient progresses. This reinforces functional gains for the patient. A physical therapist might integrate breathing control into exercises to support what the patient is learning in speech therapy. The occupational therapist might add a simple standing balance task into an activity to reinforce the physical therapist’s goals. A speech therapist could add accurate switch targeting into treatment to follow through with the assistive technologist’s adaptations.


Physical therapy interventions for the neurologically involved patient continue to evolve. In addition to continuously improving traditional techniques, expect to see advancements utilizing robotics, neuro-electric interfacing, and, potentially, exoskeletons. New ideas, continued research, and developing technology are all solid allies for the improved future recovery of individuals with brain injuries. 

A man is holding a fish in his hand in front of a lake.
By Dan Lewis Foundation November 6, 2024
After a life-altering accident in October 2022, Devon Guffey’s story is about resilience and determination. His journey has been profiled in the summer 2023 issue of the Making Headway Newsletter: https://www.danlewisfoundation.org/devons-story . Hit by a drunk driver, Devon sustained severe brain and physical injuries, including axonal shearing, a traumatic frontal lobe injury, and facial fractures. Even after contracting meningitis while in a coma, Devon fought hard to survive – and today, his recovery continues to inspire us all. In late 2023, Devon worked as an assistant basketball coach at Blue River Valley, where he had once been a student. His love for sports and dedication to regaining his physical strength returned him to the gym, where his hard work paid off. Devon’s persistence earned him another job at the YMCA, guiding gym members and supporting facility upkeep. Through all the challenges—deafness in one ear, blindness in one eye, and a permanent loss of taste and smell—Devon perseveres. He recently regained his driving license, a significant milestone that symbolizes his increasing independence and cognitive and physical recovery. While each day may not show significant changes, Devon now sees his progress over time. Today, Devon speaks to groups about his journey, the dangers of drunk driving, and finding strength in adversity. His message is clear: recovery is a process, and sometimes, "can't" simply means "can't do it yet ." Every TBI is unique, and Devon’s story powerfully reminds us of the strength that comes from resilience and community. We are grateful to Devon for continuing to share his story and for his role in uplifting others facing difficult paths. His journey is a testament to the fact that we are stronger together. #BrainInjuryAwareness #DevonsJourney #Resilience #EndDrunkDriving #MakingHeadway
A close up of a brain with a lot of cells and a purple background.
By Dan Lewis Foundation | Summer 2024 July 10, 2024
Scientists worldwide are working to find ways to stimulate healing and functional recovery after severe brain injuries. This work is driven by the desperate needs of persons who have suffered brain damage. It is inspired by the knowledge that the information required to create new brain cells, cause these cells to interconnect, and stimulate new learning is contained in our genome. Now that we can readily generate stem cells from adult tissue, we have access to the genomic program that can control all of the intricate details of brain tissue formation. A number of different research themes are being pursued productively. These include: (1) enabling injured neurons to self-repair (“axonal repair”) 1,2 ; (2) replacing damaged tissue by increasing the growth of new neurons (“neurogenesis”) 3-5 ; (3) transplanting new brain cells that are derived from a person’s own stem cells (“autologous cellular repletion”) 6-8 ; (4) stimulating the re-wiring of new or surviving tissue by encouraging the formation of new connections (“synaptogenesis”) 9,10 ; and (5) augmenting the function of a damaged brain by the use of bio-computational prostheses (“brain-computer interfaces”) 11,12 ; We’ve explored these themes in previous newsletters. The goal of stimulating meaningful brain regeneration is now sufficiently plausible that a large-scale, well-funded campaign needs to be funded to bring meaningful new therapies to patients within the foreseeable future. Here, we suggest a high-level outline of the research themes for such a campaign. A ‘moon shot’ program towards brain regeneration would leverage cutting-edge technologies in stem cell research, gene therapy, synaptic plasticity, neuronal repair, and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to develop innovative treatments for brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. These treatments would target the restoration of lost brain functions and improvement in the quality of life for individuals affected by severe brain injuries. This research agenda aims to catalyze serious discussion about creating a federal program with funding, organizational resources, and expert governance to enable brain regeneration in our lifetimes. Major Themes For a Brain Regeneration “Moon Shot” Program 1: Promote the formation of new neurons 1.1 Stimulate the brain to create new neurons 1.2 Create new neurons from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells to be transplanted back into the patient. Create new glial cells to support neurogenesis. 2: Stimulate new synaptic formation 2.1 Develop drugs that enhance synaptic plasticity and promote the formation of new synaptic connections 3: Stimulate self-repair of damaged neurons 3.1 Develop drugs that de-repress neurons and, thereby, enable axonal regrowth 4: Develop brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for brain-injured patients 4.1: Develop and test BCIs that enable the brain to control behaviors or external devices and, thereby, augment or replace impaired functions. 4.2: Develop and test BCIs that can accelerate the training of remapped brain tissue in persons with brain injuries to optimize functional recovery. 4.3: Combine BCIs with other strategies (e.g., cell repletion, synaptogenesis, and enhanced plasticity) to accelerate adaptation and functional improvement. The proposed research themes can underpin targeted research to stimulate meaningful brain regeneration, offering new hope for patients with brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. While the scientific challenges are profound, there has been sufficient progress to justify substantial investment in brain regeneration research. Any such large-scale program will require coordinated collaborations among academic and commercial partners, skillful governance and management, and a shared sense of profound commitment to the goal. The recent pace of advances in cell biology, stem cell technology, bio-computational interfaces, and genomically targeting medicines suggests that large-scale investment will yield meaningful clinical advances toward brain regeneration after injury. With robust funding and skilled leadership, this comprehensive research agenda has a realistic potential to transform scientific breakthroughs into tangible medical therapies, offering hope to millions affected by brain damage.
Share by: