Can Damaged Brain Tissue be Replaced?
Dan Lewis Foundation | Spring 2023

The idea of replacing damaged brain tissue is intriguing and, at the same time, seemingly implausible. When vital brain tissue is damaged or destroyed, the function served by this tissue is lost. Other brain regions may provide some functional compensation, but in adults, this compensatory adaptation is limited. The field of brain regeneration research is driven by the vision that a meaningful regrowth or regeneration of brain tissue might be achieved. 

 

Embryonic cells know how to grow and form brain tissue. These cells contain all the information required to divide, migrate, connect, and differentiate into specific functional brain regions or subunits. Can this genetic knowledge somehow be unlocked or reactivated in a damaged, mature brain? 

 

In recent decades, scientists have taken steps towards this goal. For example, scientists learned how to cause the fibroblast cells in a snippet of skin to revert to embryo-like cells, called induced pluripotent stem cells ('iPSCs'). These iPSCs have all the information necessary to form any mature tissue or organ. Under the right conditions, these cells can be guided to differentiate into nerve tissue, cardiac tissue, and many other mature structures.


Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

 

Brain regeneration researchers have begun to seriously explore the possibility that cells or tissues derived from these 'reawakened' cells might be reintroduced into a damaged brain. 1 The hope is that these cells might engraft into the brain, recreate the damaged anatomy, and reconnect with other brain regions.  This embedded patch might, in this scenario, be retrained, enabling the re-acquisition of the lost functions.

 

There are now reports of 'derived neurons' being introduced into a damaged brain to repair a damaged brain structure. One such example involves using iPSCs to generate dopamine-producing neurons, which are the type of neurons that degenerate in Parkinson's disease. In theory, these derived neurons can be transplanted into patients' brains to replace the lost neurons and restore dopamine function.

 

In one study, researchers transplanted iPSC-derived dopamine neurons into the brains of monkeys with a Parkinson's-like condition. 2 The transplanted neurons survived, integrated into the host brain, and produced dopamine, improving motor function.  Clinical trials are underway to determine if this approach can be safe and effective in humans, with some encouraging initial results in both motor function and quality of life. 3 This highly targeted cellular replacement research is a long way from replacing large regions of the brain cortex lost from trauma. Still, its success demonstrates that, in principle, new cellular material derived from induced pluripotent stem cells can be used to replace lost brain functions.

 

Organoids


Several years ago, some teams observed that if iPSCs are cultured for a longer period under particular conditions, they begin to clump into tissues.  The tissue aggregates that form from derived neurons begin to take on some of the forms and structures of a developing brain.  These cellular aggregates are called
organoids. These brain organoids contain multiple cell types and regions found in the developing brain, including neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes.  Because brain organoids resemble a developing brain, they are being used to study normal brain development and disease mechanisms. 4

 

Organoids possess the ability to self-organize in a dramatic fashion.  The resulting structures manifest many features of developing brains.  This demonstrates that the interplay between genomic instructions inherent in derived neurons and different forms of cell-cell signaling is sufficient to guide the formation of complex structures.


While there is a long path ahead to determine if human organoids can ever replace and replete brain tissue that has been destroyed or damaged, there has been important progress toward this goal in recent years.

 

In a study published in 2018, a team led by Dr. Fred Gage transplanted human brain organoids into the brains of adult mice.5 The study shows that organoid grafts developed into functional neuronal networks with axons that grew to multiple regions of the host brain. The grafts also had functional blood vessels and integrated microglia. They also showed that the grafts had neuronal activity and suggested that there was functional synaptic connectivity between the graft and the host brain. This study demonstrates that a human organoid can survive transplantation, grow, and create connections to an adult mouse brain.

 

In a more recent study, researchers transplanted human brain organoids into the brains of neonatal mice. They found that the transplanted organoids survived and extended projections over a significant distance to connect with the host brain. The transplanted human neurons could function and deeply integrate into the mouse neural circuits. Furthermore, the mice transplanted with cerebral organoids showed an increase in the startle fear response, suggesting that the organoids have the potential to modulate behavior.6 This study demonstrates that the connections formed between the organoid graft and the developing mouse brain are functionally active. 

 

Two new studies demonstrate that the circuits created between the organoid and the host brain can respond to precise sensory stimuli and be trained to influence the animal's behavior. That is, a sensation perceived in the engrafted cells could be linked to a reward such that the animal changed its behavior after stimulation. The organoid in these studies becomes rewired into both the sensory and motivational circuits of the host. 7,8

 

While these and other studies9 provide some evidence that brain organoids could potentially be used to treat neurological disorders in the future, there remain many scientific, technical, and ethical barriers to the success of this approach. It is still very unclear whether human brain organoids can eventually be implanted to induce functional recovery in persons who have suffered a serious brain injury. 

 

All cautions notwithstanding, the demonstration that a small snippet of skin contains the capacity to be transformed into pluripotent stem cells, matured into derived neurons, and then nurtured into a 'mini-brain' that can be implanted into another species, grow, and functionally integrate into that animal's brain has to be viewed as miraculous. This research is a source of great hope that meaningful functional recovery after severe brain injuries may be achieved.



References


  1. Chen, C., Kim, W.-Y. & Jiang, P. Humanized neuronal chimeric mouse brain generated by neonatally engrafted human iPSC-derived primitive neural progenitor cells. JCI Insight 1, e88632 (2016).
  2. Kikuchi, T.et al.Human iPS cell-derived dopaminergic neurons function in a primate Parkinson’s disease model.Nature548, 592–596 (2017).
  3. Doi, D.et al. Pre-clinical study of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived dopaminergic progenitor cells for Parkinson’s disease.Nat. Commun.11, 3369 (2020).
  4. Trujillo, C. A. & Muotri, A. R. Brain Organoids and the Study of Neurodevelopment.Trends Mol. Med.24, 982–990 (2018).
  5. Mansour, A. A.et al. An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids.Nat. Biotechnol.36, 432–441 (2018).
  6. Dong, X.et al. Human cerebral organoids establish subcortical projections in the mouse brain after transplantation.Mol. Psychiatry26, 2964–2976 (2021).
  7. Wilson, M. N.et al.Multimodal monitoring of human cortical organoids implanted in mice reveal functional connection with visual cortex.Nat. Commun.13, 7945 (2022).
  8. Revah, O.et al.Maturation and circuit integration of transplanted human cortical organoids.Nature 610, 319–326 (2022).
  9. Ramirez, S.et al. Modeling Traumatic Brain Injury in Human Cerebral Organoids.Cells 10, (2021).
A gold trophy with a laurel wreath around it.
By Dan Lewis Foundation April 2, 2025
For the third consecutive year, the Dan Lewis Foundation for Brain Regeneration is proud to announce the DLF Prize competition. The 2025 DLF Prize, a $20,000 award, will recognize an outstanding early career scientist (2 to 5 years post-doc) conducting innovative research in neuroscience, pharmacology, or biotechnology. This prestigious prize honors researchers whose work aligns with the DLF mission to drive breakthroughs in neural regeneration and repair. The current research priorities of the DLF are: Pharmacological Reactivation of Neural Repair: Research into pharmacological methods of reactivating or augmenting synaptogenesis, neurogenesis or axonal repair. Cell-Based Cortical Repair: Investigating the potential of derived cortical neurons to restore function in damaged cortical regions. Transcriptomics of Neural Recovery: Characterizing transcriptomic profiles of cortical neurons in the recovery phase following brain injury to identify pathways that drive repair. Molecular Inhibitor Targeting: Advancing anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASO’s) or small-molecule therapeutics designed to downregulate inhibitors of neural regeneration in the cortex or spinal cord. Application for the 2025 DLF Prize can be made by going to our website— danlewisfoundation.org —and clicking on the Tab “ 2025 DLF Prize ”. This will bring you into the application portal. The application portal opened in March, 2025 and will remain open through May 31st. Once in the portal, you will find complete information about the DLF prize, eligibility requirements, and an application form which can be filled in and submitted online. The winner of the 2023 DLF Prize, Dr. Roy Maimon, continues his research indicating that downregulation of PTBP1, an RNA-binding protein, can convert glial cells into neurons in the adult brain (Maimon et al. 2024) .* Dr. Maimon, currently a post-doc at the University of California, San Diego is currently interviewing for a faculty position at several prominent neuroscience departments. The winner of the 2024 DLF Prize, Dr. William Zeiger is a physician-scientist in the Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Division, at UCLA. Dr. Zeiger has expertise in interrogating neural circuits using a classic “lesional neurology” approach. He states, “Our lab remains focused on understanding how neural circuits become dysfunctional after lesions to the cortex and on investigating novel circuit-based approaches to reactivate and restore damaged cortex”. * Maimon, Roy, Carlos Chillon-Marinas, Sonia Vazquez-Sanchez, Colin Kern, Kresna Jenie, Kseniya Malukhina, Stephen Moore, et al. 2024. “Re-Activation of Neurogenic Niches in Aging Brain.” BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.27.575940.
By Dan Lewis Foundation April 2, 2025
Alan was injured in 2021, at age 42. An art teacher in Lakewood, Colorado, Alan was riding his bicycle after school and was crossing at an intersection when a truck turned into the crosswalk area and hit him. Alan reports no memory of the event but has been told this is what happened. Alan says “My frontal lobe took the brunt of the impact, particularly the left frontal lobe”. Alan had a 2 ½ week stay at a nearby hospital where he, “re-learned to talk, to walk, and drink”-- although again he reports no memory of his stay there. Alan was then transferred to Craig Rehabilitation Hospital, in Englewood, Colorado. Alan says, “The only reason I knew I was at Craig is that I rolled over in bed and saw “Welcome to Craig” on the dry erase board.” During this stage of recovering, Alan repeatedly denied that he had been in an accident. Twice he tried to leave Craig on his own accord despite his wife’s and his therapists’ assurances that it was important for him to stay to recuperate from his injuries. Alan’s wife was 8 months pregnant at the time of his accident and gave birth to their son while Alan was an inpatient at Craig. Alan’s wife brought his newborn son to visit him days after the birth and Alan held him while sitting in his wheelchair, but Alan wistfully reports this is another thing he can’t remember. Alan reports that he still has significant difficulties with memory. Alan has also experienced several other neuropsychological difficulties. He states that for months after his injury, he could not experience emotion. “I could not laugh, I couldn’t cry.” Even after three years, his emotional experience is constricted. However, an emotion that is sometimes elevated is irritation and anger. Sometimes, dealing with people can be difficult because he may have temper flare-ups with little reason. This is something that Alan regrets and he is working hard with his neuropsychologist to improve the regulation of his emotions. Alan also has difficulty with organization, motivation, and distractibility. Earlier in his recovery, he had trouble sequencing and had difficulty carrying out personal and household routines. Alan has benefited greatly from therapy and his own hard work to make improvements in these areas. A chief reason that Alan works so hard in his recovery is so that he can be a good father to his son who is now almost 3 years old. He recognizes that it is important not to get frustrated when it seems that he can’t provide what his son wants or needs at a given moment. “I’m trying to raise my son the best I can…he’s at such a pivotal time in his life.” Alan’s financial situation was helped for a time by Social Security Disability Insurance payments but these payments ended. He is trying to get SSDI reinstated but the process of doing so is confusing and is taking a lot of time. Alan returned to work about 11 months ago at a liquor store (after about 2 years of not being able to work), the same store where he previously worked part time while teaching. He works in the wine department. “I sell wine and make recommendations.” When asked for advice to other brain injury survivors, Alan’s words were: “No matter how confused or upset you are or how frustrated you get, keep pressing on and moving forward because there is light at the end of the tunnel even though it may seem long. Keep moving forward and don’t give up no matter what anyone says to you”. Alan added that supports for individuals with brain injury are very important. He has found support groups, retreats, and seminars/events where brain injury survivors can share their experience to be very helpful. The volunteer work he does at Craig Hospital has been valuable for him. Alan is an inspiring individual. Despite having scarce memory of his accident and some confusion about the functional losses he has experienced, Alan has worked hard to make his recovery as complete as possible. He continues to work hard to progress and to express gratitude for those who have assisted him along the way.