Targeting the Genome to Promote Brain Regeneration
Dan Lewis Foundation | Summer 2023

The human genome is the maestro of the brain’s formation, growth, and maturation. As a person develops and interacts with environmental stimuli, the genetic program in all cells gradually unfurls itself. In a beautifully coordinated process, our DNA transcribes its information into RNA, which in turn mediates the synthesis of proteins that are essential for all life functions. For axons to repair themselves, for new synapses to form, and for neurons to proliferate, the respective elements of the genome must spring into action. As the brain matures, some of the properties of the developing brain are lost or diminished. Stimulating a brain to regenerate after injury will require reactivating these dormant genomic functions.


How, then, have scientists focused explicitly on the challenge of stimulating brain regeneration at the genetic level? 


One method, gene therapy, involves introducing new genetic material into adult cells. Gene therapy uses harmless viruses, specifically adeno-associated viruses (“AAVs”) to deliver new genetic material into cells and, thereby, modify cellular activities. This method may be advantageous to target the brain since the blood-brain barrier often prevents other small molecule therapeutics from accessing brain tissue. Many investigators are studying the use of AAVs in preclinical studies to deliver genes promoting neuronal survival and growth in models of neurodegenerative disease.¹ Gene therapy results in a permanent change in the cell’s genome. New genetic material is incorporated into the cell’s genome, and this new genetic information then controls the activity of the cells by creating new or modified proteins. By causing the synthesis of proteins required for the formation of new cells or connections, AAV-mediated gene therapy may, someday, drive meaningful brain regeneration.


Gene therapy is technically very challenging. Figuring out the right dose of virus to administer is difficult, and it is usually not possible to administer multiple doses, since the body develops an immune response to the virus. Notwithstanding the difficulties in this approach, one team has used a gene therapy construct to regenerate many functional new neurons in an adult mouse model after ischemic injury.² This study provides some evidence that there is a reservoir of cells in the brain that can potentially be converted into replacement neurons.


Another approach to modifying the genome is to use “gene editing.” In this approach, a molecular ‘cut-and-paste’ tool has been discovered and developed to insert specific corrections into the target genome. For example, researchers have initiated clinical trials using gene editing (“CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing”) to treat a genetic form of blindness, Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis.³ This form of gene editing has been performed on cells in the back of the eye, and the induced corrections have led to the partial restoration of vision. This groundbreaking achievement offers renewed hope for applying similar strategies in brain regeneration. However, it is more difficult to imagine how gene editing techniques can deliver their corrective ‘payload’ to targeted regions.


The spotlight is shifting towards a third approach to manipulating the genome by using small, DNA-like molecules called “antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)” to modulate gene activity. Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are short, synthetic strands of modified DNA that can bind to specific RNA molecules and alter their activity. An ASO is a small molecular ‘patch’ that finds a specific location in the RNA message created by the genome to guide the formation of proteins. By ‘patching’ the mRNA, an ASO either prevents the production of harmful proteins or increases the production of beneficial ones. This class of molecules can target and modulate the formation of proteins with exquisite specificity. ASOs may be useful to stimulate brain regeneration by silencing genes that inhibit neuronal growth and plasticity or boosting genes that promote these processes. ASOs can be developed relatively rapidly, and their dosage is easier to titrate compared to AAV gene therapy or gene editing approaches.


There are already several examples of ASOs in use to target genetic controls in the brain in a selective manner. For instance, the FDA-approved drug Nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an ASO that increases the production of a critical motor neuron protein, thereby improving motor function in affected children.⁴ After many years of research, clinical trials are now underway to treat Huntington’s disease with ASOs.⁵ Finally, ASOs are showing promise in early-stage clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) by reducing the levels of a harmful protein that accumulates in the brain cells of patients.⁶ Dozens of ASO drug development programs that target the brain are now underway. Scientists, families of afflicted patients, and biotech companies are fully engaged in promising collaborations to unlock the brain’s capacity for healing. In previous newsletters, we have identified several promising areas of research that aim to stimulate significant brain regeneration and functional recovery after a major brain injury. We’ve explored several of these: how nerve cells (neurons) can be induced to repair their long tract connections, ‘axonal repair’ after spinal cord injury⁷; how the growth of new connections between neurons in surviving brain regions can be stimulated, ‘synaptogenesis and induced plasticity’⁸; and how to stimulate the creation of new neurons, ‘neurogenesis’ or to integrate newly transplanted (replacement) cells in the brain simulating neurogenesis.⁹


These strategies all rely on a thorough understanding of how the human genome controls axonal repair, synaptogenesis, and neurogenesis. The same genomic information that guides the brain’s growth and development contains the information necessary to regenerate after damage. This generation of brain scientists is inexorably unlocking that potential and learning how to allow the brain to heal itself.


The Dan Lewis Foundation is closely following multiple lines of research in the field of brain regeneration. The DLF is committed to encouraging and catalyzing such research through collegial exchange, linking researchers, disseminating new research findings, awarding the DLF Prize, and directly funding research as funds become available.


References


1. Ozlu, C., Bailey, R. M., Sinnett, S. & Goodspeed, K. D. Gene Transfer Therapy for Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Dev. Neurosci. 43, 230–240 (2021).

2. Chen, Y.-C.et al. A NeuroD1 AAV-Based Gene Therapy for Functional Brain Repair after Ischemic Injury through In Vivo Astrocyte-to-Neuron Conversion. Mol. Ther. 28, 217–234 (2020).

3. Daich Varela, M., Cabral de Guimaraes, T. A., Georgiou, M. & Michaelides, M. Leber congenital amaurosis/early-onset severe retinal dystrophy: current management and clinical trials. Br. J. Ophthalmol.106, 445–451 (2022).

4. Finkel, R. S.et al. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1723–1732 (2017).

5. Rook, M. E. & Southwell, A. L. Antisense Oligonucleotide Therapy: From Design to the Huntington Disease Clinic. BioDrugs 36, 105–119 (2022).

6. Boros, B. D., Schoch, K. M., Kreple, C. J. & Miller, T. M. Antisense Oligonucleotides for the Study and Treatment of ALS. Neurotherapeutics 19, 1145–1158 (2022).

7. Towards Brain Regeneration and Functional Recovery. Making Headway: DLF NeuroConnections (Fall 2022).

8. The Synapse and Brain Regeneration. Making Headway: DLF NeuroConnections (Winter 2023).

9. Can Damaged Tissue Be Replaced? Making Headway: DLF NeuroConnections (2023).

A gold trophy with a laurel wreath around it.
By Dan Lewis Foundation April 2, 2025
For the third consecutive year, the Dan Lewis Foundation for Brain Regeneration is proud to announce the DLF Prize competition. The 2025 DLF Prize, a $20,000 award, will recognize an outstanding early career scientist (2 to 5 years post-doc) conducting innovative research in neuroscience, pharmacology, or biotechnology. This prestigious prize honors researchers whose work aligns with the DLF mission to drive breakthroughs in neural regeneration and repair. The current research priorities of the DLF are: Pharmacological Reactivation of Neural Repair: Research into pharmacological methods of reactivating or augmenting synaptogenesis, neurogenesis or axonal repair. Cell-Based Cortical Repair: Investigating the potential of derived cortical neurons to restore function in damaged cortical regions. Transcriptomics of Neural Recovery: Characterizing transcriptomic profiles of cortical neurons in the recovery phase following brain injury to identify pathways that drive repair. Molecular Inhibitor Targeting: Advancing anti-sense oligonucleotides (ASO’s) or small-molecule therapeutics designed to downregulate inhibitors of neural regeneration in the cortex or spinal cord. Application for the 2025 DLF Prize can be made by going to our website— danlewisfoundation.org —and clicking on the Tab “ 2025 DLF Prize ”. This will bring you into the application portal. The application portal opened in March, 2025 and will remain open through May 31st. Once in the portal, you will find complete information about the DLF prize, eligibility requirements, and an application form which can be filled in and submitted online. The winner of the 2023 DLF Prize, Dr. Roy Maimon, continues his research indicating that downregulation of PTBP1, an RNA-binding protein, can convert glial cells into neurons in the adult brain (Maimon et al. 2024) .* Dr. Maimon, currently a post-doc at the University of California, San Diego is currently interviewing for a faculty position at several prominent neuroscience departments. The winner of the 2024 DLF Prize, Dr. William Zeiger is a physician-scientist in the Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders Division, at UCLA. Dr. Zeiger has expertise in interrogating neural circuits using a classic “lesional neurology” approach. He states, “Our lab remains focused on understanding how neural circuits become dysfunctional after lesions to the cortex and on investigating novel circuit-based approaches to reactivate and restore damaged cortex”. * Maimon, Roy, Carlos Chillon-Marinas, Sonia Vazquez-Sanchez, Colin Kern, Kresna Jenie, Kseniya Malukhina, Stephen Moore, et al. 2024. “Re-Activation of Neurogenic Niches in Aging Brain.” BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.27.575940.
By Dan Lewis Foundation April 2, 2025
Alan was injured in 2021, at age 42. An art teacher in Lakewood, Colorado, Alan was riding his bicycle after school and was crossing at an intersection when a truck turned into the crosswalk area and hit him. Alan reports no memory of the event but has been told this is what happened. Alan says “My frontal lobe took the brunt of the impact, particularly the left frontal lobe”. Alan had a 2 ½ week stay at a nearby hospital where he, “re-learned to talk, to walk, and drink”-- although again he reports no memory of his stay there. Alan was then transferred to Craig Rehabilitation Hospital, in Englewood, Colorado. Alan says, “The only reason I knew I was at Craig is that I rolled over in bed and saw “Welcome to Craig” on the dry erase board.” During this stage of recovering, Alan repeatedly denied that he had been in an accident. Twice he tried to leave Craig on his own accord despite his wife’s and his therapists’ assurances that it was important for him to stay to recuperate from his injuries. Alan’s wife was 8 months pregnant at the time of his accident and gave birth to their son while Alan was an inpatient at Craig. Alan’s wife brought his newborn son to visit him days after the birth and Alan held him while sitting in his wheelchair, but Alan wistfully reports this is another thing he can’t remember. Alan reports that he still has significant difficulties with memory. Alan has also experienced several other neuropsychological difficulties. He states that for months after his injury, he could not experience emotion. “I could not laugh, I couldn’t cry.” Even after three years, his emotional experience is constricted. However, an emotion that is sometimes elevated is irritation and anger. Sometimes, dealing with people can be difficult because he may have temper flare-ups with little reason. This is something that Alan regrets and he is working hard with his neuropsychologist to improve the regulation of his emotions. Alan also has difficulty with organization, motivation, and distractibility. Earlier in his recovery, he had trouble sequencing and had difficulty carrying out personal and household routines. Alan has benefited greatly from therapy and his own hard work to make improvements in these areas. A chief reason that Alan works so hard in his recovery is so that he can be a good father to his son who is now almost 3 years old. He recognizes that it is important not to get frustrated when it seems that he can’t provide what his son wants or needs at a given moment. “I’m trying to raise my son the best I can…he’s at such a pivotal time in his life.” Alan’s financial situation was helped for a time by Social Security Disability Insurance payments but these payments ended. He is trying to get SSDI reinstated but the process of doing so is confusing and is taking a lot of time. Alan returned to work about 11 months ago at a liquor store (after about 2 years of not being able to work), the same store where he previously worked part time while teaching. He works in the wine department. “I sell wine and make recommendations.” When asked for advice to other brain injury survivors, Alan’s words were: “No matter how confused or upset you are or how frustrated you get, keep pressing on and moving forward because there is light at the end of the tunnel even though it may seem long. Keep moving forward and don’t give up no matter what anyone says to you”. Alan added that supports for individuals with brain injury are very important. He has found support groups, retreats, and seminars/events where brain injury survivors can share their experience to be very helpful. The volunteer work he does at Craig Hospital has been valuable for him. Alan is an inspiring individual. Despite having scarce memory of his accident and some confusion about the functional losses he has experienced, Alan has worked hard to make his recovery as complete as possible. He continues to work hard to progress and to express gratitude for those who have assisted him along the way.