Rethinking Stroke Recovery: New Insights into Neuronal Remapping and Rehabilitation Potential
Dan Lewis Foundation

Stroke is a common neurological condition that damages brain cells (neurons) in the affected area, leading to a loss of the functions controlled by that region. A hopeful aspect of stroke recovery is that, over time and with rehabilitation, many individuals regain some abilities. This recovery has been linked to a process called “remapping,” where neurons in unaffected areas of the brain adapt to take over the functions of the damaged areas. Although many studies have explored this remapping phenomenon, most evidence has been indirect, based on changes in brain activation patterns or neuron connections after stroke in animal models. Direct proof that neurons change functionality after stroke has been lacking, partly because measuring neuron activity in the brain over time, especially at the necessary scale and duration, is challenging.

A man in a white lab coat and tie is standing in front of a blue background.

With advances in neuroscience and microscopy, we set out to test the remapping hypothesis and obtain direct evidence. We induced precise strokes in the part of a mouse’s brain responsible for processing sensory information from whiskers—the somatosensory whisker barrel cortex. While humans don’t have whiskers, the whisker barrel cortex in mice has key features that make it ideal for studying fundamental neuroscience questions. Mice use their whiskers as a primary sensory tool, and the whisker barrel cortex has a precise anatomy where each whisker’s sensory data is processed in distinct columns (or barrels) in the cortex, arranged just as whiskers are on the snout. This setup allows us to pinpoint brain areas activated by specific whisker stimulation.


Using specialized microscopy to observe hundreds of neurons in real-time, we tested remapping by targeting a stroke to a specific barrel of neurons, the “C1” barrel. Before the stroke, only a few neurons in neighboring barrels responded to the C1 whisker. Based on the remapping theory, we anticipated that after the stroke, these nearby neurons would take on the C1 barrel’s function. Surprisingly, we found the opposite: fewer neurons responded to the C1 whisker, and this low response rate persisted for up to two months. When we stimulated other whiskers, these same neurons responded normally, indicating they weren’t damaged but had lost responsiveness specifically to the C1 whisker.


We then applied a rehabilitation technique known as forced use therapy, trimming all whiskers except the C1 whisker, akin to encouraging stroke patients to use a weaker limb during physical therapy. This approach didn’t increase the number of neurons responding to the C1 whisker, but the few neurons that did respond showed more reliable responses with forced use therapy. Our

findings indicate that remapping doesn’t occur naturally after stroke; instead, rehabilitation may work by enhancing the function of existing neurons rather than promoting remapping.


Our study has some limitations. Humans don’t have whiskers, so our results might not translate directly. Additionally, we focused on the sensory system, and other brain areas, like the motor cortex, might recover differently. However, our work adds to evidence suggesting that adaptive plasticity and remapping in brain areas spared by stroke are limited, not enhanced. While this might seem discouraging, it opens new avenues for brain recovery. We may be able to restore function by targeting spared neurons that are dysfunctional but not irreversibly damaged, creating a critical window for post-stroke interventions like optimized physical therapy.


In future work, instead of assuming spontaneous brain remapping, we aim to investigate the specific circuits and molecular mechanisms that limit adaptive plasticity after brain injury. We’re expanding our whisker barrel cortex model and using genetic tools to examine how different types of neurons are affected by stroke. We are studying interactions between neuron populations to understand how these relationships affect remapping potential. Additionally, by analyzing changes in gene expression within neuron populations, we hope to identify new molecular targets that could lead to therapies promoting plasticity, remapping, and recovery for stroke and other brain injuries.

Two women embrace, comforted. A man watches from a separate chair. Interior, daytime.
By Hal Lewis December 5, 2025
My daughter, currently nearing completion of a graduate program in counselling, recently introduced me to the term “ambiguous loss”. This term applies to a loss that is unclear and lacks certainty, leaving family members and close friends feeling stuck because it is so difficult to mourn or find closure. One type of ambiguous loss is when the person is physically present but psychologically absent because their personality, memory, cognition, or emotional connection has been altered. Examples might include a family member with dementia, a progressive disease, a severe emotional disorder, or substantial brain injury. A second type of ambiguous loss is when the person is psychologically present but physically absent. This could include a missing person due to a natural disaster, a long- term incarceration, a kidnapping, or severe estrangement from the family. This type of loss can lead to intense confusion, frozen grief, and a prolonged sense of helplessness.
Marchell smiling, sitting on a couch, holding notebooks
By Dan Lewis Foundation December 2, 2025
Marchell is an engaging and energetic middle-aged man who was enthusiastic about being interviewed for the DLF newsletter. He is an activist working to promote the rights and well-being of persons in the brain injury community, with a particular emphasis on helping persons with brain injury who are incarcerated or have been released from prison. Marchell is a successful businessman, proud of the company he co-founded--the Association of Young Business Owners (AYBOS), a marketing company in the Denver, Colorado area. He also works for Well Power (Denver’s Mental Health Center system) as a Zero Suicide Certified Peer and Family Specialist.  Marchell is clearly a man on the move to get a lot of positive things done. But this wasn’t always the case. Marchell spent much of his younger adult life incarcerated himself for a variety of crimes including robbery and assault. He had a history of recidivism following multiple releases.