Brain-Computer Interfaces to Augment Brain Regeneration
Dan Lewis Foundation | Spring 2024

In prior newsletters, we’ve discussed research strategies that bring hope to persons with severe disabilities after a major brain injury.  We’ve discussed research focused on creating and transplanting new brain cells to replace damaged tissue [“cellular repletion” ].  We’ve reviewed progress towards stimulating the brain to regrow [“regeneration”] and rewire itself [“axonal repair”] as it seeks to compensate for damage.  We’ve explored evidence that the brain can be induced to regenerate new connections [ “synaptogenesis”].


This edition will discuss how biomechanical devices called brain-computer interfaces (“BCIs”) can help a person compensate for an injured brain.  We will also explore how new medicines may help a person maximize the benefits of BCIs. The idea of a direct connection between a person’s brain and the external world mediated by a computer sounds like an idea from science fiction.  Nevertheless, brain-computer interface devices have been developed and are beginning to be implanted in patients.



What is a BCI?

At its essence, a brain-computer interface is a system that allows direct communication between the human brain and the world, either for sensory inputs or motor outputs. Imagine typing a message, playing a song, controlling an artificial limb, or steering a wheelchair merely by thinking about it. Picture a blind person having a camera-like device that is hardwired to the visual cortex to enable sight or a glove that transmits sensory information directly to the cortex for interpretation.  More formally, a BCI is a type of prosthesis that allows regions of the brain to be reconnected to parts of the body or the outside world after the natural neuronal connections have been lost. BCIs connect the world to the brain for interpretation and the brain to the world for action.



How Do BCIs Work?

The magic behind BCIs lies in their ability to decode and encode the brain's electrical signals. Our thoughts and intentions spark neural activity, generating distinctive electrical patterns.  Our sensations exist as patterns of neuronal excitation in the brain.  BCIs can control limbs or external devices by detecting the electrical patterns of intentions and then translating these signals into commands that can control a prosthetic limb, a cursor on a screen, or the hand of a person whose spinal cord has been severed.  BCIs tap into the brain’s electrical activity using various sensors placed on the scalp (non-invasively) or directly within the brain (invasively) to detect and record these signals. Once these signals are captured, they are fed into a computer that interprets them using sophisticated algorithms. This process translates the brain's electrical activity into commands controlling external devices or encoding sensory information to be transmitted directly to the brain (see Figure 1).



The Potential Impact of BCIs:

There are numerous potential impacts of BCIs for persons who have suffered a severe brain injury.  A BCI can allow someone who is paralyzed to control a limb again.  BCIs may be used to stimulate regions of the brain to accelerate the brain’s reprogramming after a major injury.  Some will be able to use a BCI to directly control an external device by sending signals from the brain to an external device. For individuals living with paralysis or severe communication barriers, BCIs offer the hope of regaining some abilities to interact with the world. In the future, devices may enable the blind to see via a direct connection between an electronic device and the brain. 1 Brain-computer interfaces have begun to enable individuals with traumatic injuries of the central nervous system to regain components of lost neurologic function, restore communication and mobility, and gain more independence. 2   Here are two short video clips about BCIs to help you better understand the technology and its implications.  The first describes what these devices are and how they work [BCI overview]. The second demonstrates the benefit of such a device for a patient with ALS [BCI in ALS].



BCIs in Clinical Trials:

Several BCIs are being tested in clinical trials, each involving a few patients (see Table 1).   Different devices and trials target different capabilities.  One trial is focused on allowing a paralyzed patient to control a computer cursor by thought alone.  Several trials are using BCIs to bypass a spinal cord injury and restore (partial) control over a limb. 3  Finally, a range of devices are being developed or trialed to accelerate brain recovery after injury. 4



Biologic Augmentation of  BCI Benefits:

As discussed elsewhere, there is real hope that new medicines will be able to unlock the brain’s ability to regenerate after a devastating injury.  Future medicines that stimulate the formation of new neurons, repair of damaged axons, or the enhanced plasticity of synaptic connections are all likely to promote functional recovery without the use of a brain-computer prosthetic device.  These medicines may also be quite useful for recipients of BCIs.  More specifically, preconditioning the brain through stimulating neurogenesis, providing autologous-derived neurons, or enhancing plasticity may amplify the benefits of (BCIs) for recipients with traumatic brain injuries.  Even after the BCI is successfully implanted, the person will need protracted training and rehabilitation to learn how to use the device. Providing autologously derived neurons to replace lost tissue may be helpful for those whose injuries resulted in a substantial loss of viable brain tissue.


To be clear, the path towards useful BCIs will be challenging. Ethical considerations, technological limitations, and the need for personalized rehabilitation strategies remain pivotal areas requiring further exploration and refinement. Despite these hurdles, the trajectory of BCI technology is undeniably promising, driven by ongoing research, clinical trials, and the real promise of restoring meaningful ability to those who have suffered a devastating brain injury.



Table 1: Selected BCI Trials

Company/Lad Device Essential Technology Function Served Reference/Link
BrainGate Co. BrainGate Intracortical brain-computer interface Enables individuals with paralysis to control assistive devices BrainGate
Neuralink Corp. Neuralink High-bandwidth neural interface Aims to facilitate direct communication between the brain and electronic devices Neuralink
Synchron, Inc. Stentrode™ Minimally invasive stent-based electrode Restores functional independence for severe paralysis patients by enabling them to control digital devices Synchron
Duke University Center for Neuroengineering Walk Again Project Non-invasive BCI with exoskeleton Restores walking ability in patients with severe spinal cord injuries Walk Again Project
Blackrock Neurotech MoveAgain BCI Implantable BCI for motor control Restores functional independence by enabling motor control of devices and potentially limbs Blackrock Neurotech

Figure 1: A BCI Example 5


References



  1. Hart, Robert. 2024. “Elon Musk Teases First Neuralink Products After Company Implants First Brain Chip In Human.”Forbes Magazine, January 30, 2024.https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2024/01/30/elon-musk-teases-first-neuralink-products-after-company-implants-first-brain-chip-in-human/.
  2. Pulse, Ieee. 2023. “The Future of Brain–computer Interfaces.” IEEE Pulse. January 25, 2023.https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/the-future-of-brain-computer-interfaces/.
  3. Samejima, Soshi, Abed Khorasani, Vaishnavi Ranganathan, Jared Nakahara, Nicholas M. Tolley, Adrien Boissenin, Vahid Shalchyan, Mohammad Reza Daliri, Joshua R. Smith, and Chet T. Moritz. 2021. “Brain-Computer-Spinal Interface Restores Upper Limb Function After Spinal Cord Injury.”IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 29 (July): 1233–42.
  4. Simon, Colin, David A. E. Bolton, Niamh C. Kennedy, Surjo R. Soekadar, and Kathy L. Ruddy. 2021. “Challenges and Opportunities for the Future of Brain-Computer Interface in Neurorehabilitation.”Frontiers in Neuroscience 15 (July): 699428.
  5. Vansteensel, Mariska J., Elmar G. M. Pels, Martin G. Bleichner, Mariana P. Branco, Timothy Denison, Zachary V. Freudenburg, Peter Gosselaar,et al.2016. “Fully Implanted Brain–Computer Interface in a Locked-In Patient with ALS.”The New England Journal of Medicine 375 (21): 2060–66.
A man is holding a fish in his hand in front of a lake.
By Dan Lewis Foundation November 6, 2024
After a life-altering accident in October 2022, Devon Guffey’s story is about resilience and determination. His journey has been profiled in the summer 2023 issue of the Making Headway Newsletter: https://www.danlewisfoundation.org/devons-story . Hit by a drunk driver, Devon sustained severe brain and physical injuries, including axonal shearing, a traumatic frontal lobe injury, and facial fractures. Even after contracting meningitis while in a coma, Devon fought hard to survive – and today, his recovery continues to inspire us all. In late 2023, Devon worked as an assistant basketball coach at Blue River Valley, where he had once been a student. His love for sports and dedication to regaining his physical strength returned him to the gym, where his hard work paid off. Devon’s persistence earned him another job at the YMCA, guiding gym members and supporting facility upkeep. Through all the challenges—deafness in one ear, blindness in one eye, and a permanent loss of taste and smell—Devon perseveres. He recently regained his driving license, a significant milestone that symbolizes his increasing independence and cognitive and physical recovery. While each day may not show significant changes, Devon now sees his progress over time. Today, Devon speaks to groups about his journey, the dangers of drunk driving, and finding strength in adversity. His message is clear: recovery is a process, and sometimes, "can't" simply means "can't do it yet ." Every TBI is unique, and Devon’s story powerfully reminds us of the strength that comes from resilience and community. We are grateful to Devon for continuing to share his story and for his role in uplifting others facing difficult paths. His journey is a testament to the fact that we are stronger together. #BrainInjuryAwareness #DevonsJourney #Resilience #EndDrunkDriving #MakingHeadway
A close up of a brain with a lot of cells and a purple background.
By Dan Lewis Foundation | Summer 2024 July 10, 2024
Scientists worldwide are working to find ways to stimulate healing and functional recovery after severe brain injuries. This work is driven by the desperate needs of persons who have suffered brain damage. It is inspired by the knowledge that the information required to create new brain cells, cause these cells to interconnect, and stimulate new learning is contained in our genome. Now that we can readily generate stem cells from adult tissue, we have access to the genomic program that can control all of the intricate details of brain tissue formation. A number of different research themes are being pursued productively. These include: (1) enabling injured neurons to self-repair (“axonal repair”) 1,2 ; (2) replacing damaged tissue by increasing the growth of new neurons (“neurogenesis”) 3-5 ; (3) transplanting new brain cells that are derived from a person’s own stem cells (“autologous cellular repletion”) 6-8 ; (4) stimulating the re-wiring of new or surviving tissue by encouraging the formation of new connections (“synaptogenesis”) 9,10 ; and (5) augmenting the function of a damaged brain by the use of bio-computational prostheses (“brain-computer interfaces”) 11,12 ; We’ve explored these themes in previous newsletters. The goal of stimulating meaningful brain regeneration is now sufficiently plausible that a large-scale, well-funded campaign needs to be funded to bring meaningful new therapies to patients within the foreseeable future. Here, we suggest a high-level outline of the research themes for such a campaign. A ‘moon shot’ program towards brain regeneration would leverage cutting-edge technologies in stem cell research, gene therapy, synaptic plasticity, neuronal repair, and brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to develop innovative treatments for brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. These treatments would target the restoration of lost brain functions and improvement in the quality of life for individuals affected by severe brain injuries. This research agenda aims to catalyze serious discussion about creating a federal program with funding, organizational resources, and expert governance to enable brain regeneration in our lifetimes. Major Themes For a Brain Regeneration “Moon Shot” Program 1: Promote the formation of new neurons 1.1 Stimulate the brain to create new neurons 1.2 Create new neurons from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells to be transplanted back into the patient. Create new glial cells to support neurogenesis. 2: Stimulate new synaptic formation 2.1 Develop drugs that enhance synaptic plasticity and promote the formation of new synaptic connections 3: Stimulate self-repair of damaged neurons 3.1 Develop drugs that de-repress neurons and, thereby, enable axonal regrowth 4: Develop brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for brain-injured patients 4.1: Develop and test BCIs that enable the brain to control behaviors or external devices and, thereby, augment or replace impaired functions. 4.2: Develop and test BCIs that can accelerate the training of remapped brain tissue in persons with brain injuries to optimize functional recovery. 4.3: Combine BCIs with other strategies (e.g., cell repletion, synaptogenesis, and enhanced plasticity) to accelerate adaptation and functional improvement. The proposed research themes can underpin targeted research to stimulate meaningful brain regeneration, offering new hope for patients with brain injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. While the scientific challenges are profound, there has been sufficient progress to justify substantial investment in brain regeneration research. Any such large-scale program will require coordinated collaborations among academic and commercial partners, skillful governance and management, and a shared sense of profound commitment to the goal. The recent pace of advances in cell biology, stem cell technology, bio-computational interfaces, and genomically targeting medicines suggests that large-scale investment will yield meaningful clinical advances toward brain regeneration after injury. With robust funding and skilled leadership, this comprehensive research agenda has a realistic potential to transform scientific breakthroughs into tangible medical therapies, offering hope to millions affected by brain damage.
Share by: